"إنهاء الحرب يتطلب انتصاراً عسكرياً حاسماً، وليس مجرد اتفاقات دبلوماسية مؤقتة" - معاريف

The Road to Peace: A Military Victory or a Temporary Agreement?

A Look at International Press Coverage of the Upcoming US Presidential Election

The upcoming US presidential election continues to dominate international media headlines. Let's delve into some prominent opinion pieces analyzing this anticipated event.

Israel's Ma'ariv: A Military Victory is the Only Path to Peace

In an article titled "She Continues to Speak in Clichés: Kamala Harris Refuses to Confront Reality," Ma'ariv's writer, Isaac Mansdorf, criticizes Kamala Harris's approach. He argues that Harris employs "the same routine political vocabulary" used by US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Secretary of State Antony Blinken regarding the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. He claims Harris's reliance on "diplomatic solutions" restricts military options. Additionally, he sees her use of the phrase "both sides" as overlooking "the reality that one side threatens the other and refuses to acknowledge its rights." Mansdorf considers Harris's proposed "diplomatic solution" a mere "respite," stressing that "a ceasefire should only be sought when the other side loses." He argues that calls for "death to Israel" from Iran, celebrations in Gaza following the October 7th events, and weapons caches in civilian homes in southern Lebanon are not indicators of a desire for peace, but rather a "Western concept" that temporarily halts the violence until the next time. Mansdorf emphasizes that any sustainable political resolution requires addressing the ideologies driving the conflict, asserting that ending the war necessitates a decisive military victory rather than temporary diplomatic agreements. He reiterates that achieving change demands an "overwhelming and convincing" military victory to bring about a tangible shift in consciousness.

The Guardian: Biden's Economy Might Not Be Enough for Victory in Pennsylvania

The Guardian's Jojo Borgues, in an article titled "Yes, Biden's Economy is Working in Pennsylvania. But it Might Not Be Enough to Win the White House," underscores the significance of the economy and its impact on voters in Pennsylvania. He asserts that "the economy will be heavy on voters' minds when they head to the polls next week." He believes that "our state - Pennsylvania - is likely to decide who becomes the next president of the United States." Borgues highlights the challenges faced by steelworkers, including stagnant wages that haven't kept pace with productivity increases over the past 40 years. He expresses concern about foreign takeovers and their potential impact on jobs, stating that "there is nothing to stop the Japanese steel company, Nippon, which is trying to buy US Steel, from cutting jobs in a few years." Borgues commends Kamala Harris's commitment to preventing the sale and the Biden administration's questioning of the acquisition's value. He emphasizes Biden's progress in areas like infrastructure, stating, "There has been a massive increase in federal spending to support infrastructure projects, and infrastructure money is working for us." Borgues acknowledges the complex factors behind economic challenges, noting that Donald Trump, "says he understands, but he doesn't, he's good at weaving simple answers to complex problems, without really having solutions." Borgues hopes that voters recognize the potential benefits of the current administration's policies, which could influence their voting choices.

The Washington Post: Two Events Highlight the Stakes in the 2024 Election

In his Washington Post article titled "These Two Events Show What's Really at Stake in the Ballot," Eugene Robinson draws attention to two contrasting campaign events held by the 2024 presidential candidates. He highlights the negative implications of Republican candidate Donald Trump's rally in New York, such as his description of Puerto Rico as a "floating island of garbage" and his attack on immigration as "the way this country was built." In contrast, Robinson notes that Harris's rally in Washington D.C. offered a stark counterpoint. He states that Harris described the nation as "the greatest idea humanity has ever conceived" and pledged to be "president for all Americans, as well as offering a seat at the table for those who disagree with her." Robinson acknowledges that Harris only had four months to introduce herself to the nation but praises her "speed and efficiency in unifying Democrats after Biden's withdrawal in July." He also highlights the challenges she faced in making "independent decisions" as Vice President. He concludes that "this is not a normal election." Robinson recalls Trump's first term, reminding readers of the "amount of damage he could inflict." He points to what he considers Trump's attempt to overturn the 2020 election results, contrasting his behavior with that of past losing candidates who "conceded defeat." Robinson concludes by noting that "the founders never imagined a woman would lead the nation, and indeed, no woman has. But that could soon change."